<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google Hate WordPress and Other Blog Platforms?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php</link>
	<description>Primarily covering topics about affiliate &#38; search engine marketing, micro &#38; mobile blogging, making money online, search engine ranking &#38; optimization, social media &#38; networking, software &#38; technology, web development &#38; graphic design, and anything else on my mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-39897</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-39897</guid>
		<description>soooo, it would appear now that wordpress has made page 1.  Albeit #8 ranking for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soooo, it would appear now that wordpress has made page 1.  Albeit #8 ranking for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogBuzz October 31, 2008 &#124; Webmaster-Source</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25516</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogBuzz October 31, 2008 &#124; Webmaster-Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25516</guid>
		<description>[...] Does Google Hate WordPress and Other Blog Platforms? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does Google Hate WordPress and Other Blog Platforms? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guttu</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25419</link>
		<dc:creator>Guttu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25419</guid>
		<description>I never thought of doing search like that. But I was sure of one thing that blogger or blogspot will be at top of the list as google owns it. Google is trying to create monopoly by making free easy softwares. And in return they display results the way they want. That is the reason I am trying to quit google software. I just tried chrome and dumped it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought of doing search like that. But I was sure of one thing that blogger or blogspot will be at top of the list as google owns it. Google is trying to create monopoly by making free easy softwares. And in return they display results the way they want. That is the reason I am trying to quit google software. I just tried chrome and dumped it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juliemarg</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25272</link>
		<dc:creator>juliemarg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25272</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an alternate thought -- perhaps blogger and blogspot come up higher because the word blog is a part of their name.

Kind of like Toys R Us vs FAO Schwarz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an alternate thought &#8212; perhaps blogger and blogspot come up higher because the word blog is a part of their name.</p>
<p>Kind of like Toys R Us vs FAO Schwarz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webby</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25267</link>
		<dc:creator>Webby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25267</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article, it really helped me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, it really helped me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aron</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25257</link>
		<dc:creator>aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25257</guid>
		<description>Did you try your research on other search engines like yahoo , msn etc. If they are ranking wordpress higher, then Google is being partial to blogger. Thus google become unfair by being biased and is trying to mislead the users from better or more accurate information

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check out aron&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProTLH/~3/433437833/muted-diwali.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A muted Diwali???&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try your research on other search engines like yahoo , msn etc. If they are ranking wordpress higher, then Google is being partial to blogger. Thus google become unfair by being biased and is trying to mislead the users from better or more accurate information</p>
<p><abbr><em>Check out aron&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ProTLH/~3/433437833/muted-diwali.html" rel="nofollow">A muted Diwali???</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEMCornwall</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25220</link>
		<dc:creator>SEMCornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25220</guid>
		<description>Just to point out Typepad is in the top results 

&quot;And as mentioned, there is no listing for WordPress.com, WordPress.org or even something remotely alternative such as TypePad.&quot;

Sethgodin.typepad.com is in the list this relates too. 

I run 80% of my blogs in typepad and they rank better than my blogger ones. I have not used wordpress before but I think that Blogger and wordpress are better for ranking as they are more manageable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to point out Typepad is in the top results </p>
<p>&#8220;And as mentioned, there is no listing for WordPress.com, WordPress.org or even something remotely alternative such as TypePad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sethgodin.typepad.com is in the list this relates too. </p>
<p>I run 80% of my blogs in typepad and they rank better than my blogger ones. I have not used wordpress before but I think that Blogger and wordpress are better for ranking as they are more manageable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25194</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25194</guid>
		<description>Well call me a troublemaker, but courtesy is not one of the Evil Green Monkey&#039;s strong points. You usually have to push past him to Danny Sullivan if you need that.

Congrats Gary on appearing legitimate! Woohoo, enjoy the external validation (sarcasm). 

Oh, and on behalf of the rest of the Sphinn community that does not have any financial interest in its operations, thanks for trying so hard to participate!

-=john andrews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well call me a troublemaker, but courtesy is not one of the Evil Green Monkey&#8217;s strong points. You usually have to push past him to Danny Sullivan if you need that.</p>
<p>Congrats Gary on appearing legitimate! Woohoo, enjoy the external validation (sarcasm). </p>
<p>Oh, and on behalf of the rest of the Sphinn community that does not have any financial interest in its operations, thanks for trying so hard to participate!</p>
<p>-=john andrews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25185</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25185</guid>
		<description>Really? Wordpress comes up #5 for me. Also among them the mandatory wikipedia entry, Googles blogger.com and blog search and yahoo&#039;s 360. Really the only one that deserves to be there is the wikipedia entry since some one searching for the word blog is probably trying to find some information on what a blog is.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check out Owen&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelinuxblog.com/working-with-csv-files-in-bash/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Working with CSV files in Bash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Wordpress comes up #5 for me. Also among them the mandatory wikipedia entry, Googles blogger.com and blog search and yahoo&#8217;s 360. Really the only one that deserves to be there is the wikipedia entry since some one searching for the word blog is probably trying to find some information on what a blog is.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Check out Owen&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://www.thelinuxblog.com/working-with-csv-files-in-bash/" rel="nofollow">Working with CSV files in Bash</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry Conn</title>
		<link>http://www.garryconn.com/does-google-hate-wordpress-and-other-blog-platforms.php/comment-page-1#comment-25176</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Conn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garryconn.com/?p=5298#comment-25176</guid>
		<description>Looks like people can &lt;strong&gt;VOTE&lt;/strong&gt; again. It seems that Sphinn thought that I was a spammer and was falsely voting on the story I submitted. As for my original account, &lt;strong&gt;guilty as charged&lt;/strong&gt;, however, in all fairness, I really didn&#039;t know what I was doing. The problem was that I submitted a story into Propeller and then I used propeller story URL when submitting into Sphinn.com.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Hi Garry,

Your submission was moved to the moderation queue by one of our mods, as patterns consistent with vote rigging were observed. On further investigation we have found that these new accounts were in fact genuine and simply a result of your promotion of Sphinn to new users. I have placed your post back into the &quot;What&#039;s New&quot; section, so that voting may resume.

With regards to your previous account, &quot;garryconn&quot;, this was terminated due to the way that the account was used. Stories from the social media site Propeller were submitted, rather than the direct blog post or story. This was seen as an attempt to simply increase popularity on another social media site rather than sharing a news article or blog post.


Regards,


Rob Kerry
evilgreenmonkey
Sphinn Editor
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that it is great that my story is back on Sphinn.com. I just checked a few minutes ago, and the story even went &lt;strong&gt;&quot;HOT&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;. There is one thing that bothers me after this whole mess comes to an end:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
we have found that these new accounts were in fact genuine and simply a result of your promotion of Sphinn to new users.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These &quot;New Accounts&quot; are &quot;My Readers&quot; whom I referred over to Sphinn.com. &lt;strong&gt;How about a thank you&lt;/strong&gt;, Rob Kerry for sending you new people to the Sphinn.com community? Or, would that be too difficult for you? 

Anyway, I am glad to see that my story is back live and even more pleased to see that it made the front page of Sphinn.com as that my aim for yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like people can <strong>VOTE</strong> again. It seems that Sphinn thought that I was a spammer and was falsely voting on the story I submitted. As for my original account, <strong>guilty as charged</strong>, however, in all fairness, I really didn&#8217;t know what I was doing. The problem was that I submitted a story into Propeller and then I used propeller story URL when submitting into Sphinn.com.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Hi Garry,</p>
<p>Your submission was moved to the moderation queue by one of our mods, as patterns consistent with vote rigging were observed. On further investigation we have found that these new accounts were in fact genuine and simply a result of your promotion of Sphinn to new users. I have placed your post back into the &#8220;What&#8217;s New&#8221; section, so that voting may resume.</p>
<p>With regards to your previous account, &#8220;garryconn&#8221;, this was terminated due to the way that the account was used. Stories from the social media site Propeller were submitted, rather than the direct blog post or story. This was seen as an attempt to simply increase popularity on another social media site rather than sharing a news article or blog post.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob Kerry<br />
evilgreenmonkey<br />
Sphinn Editor
</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that it is great that my story is back on Sphinn.com. I just checked a few minutes ago, and the story even went <strong>&#8220;HOT&#8221;</strong>. There is one thing that bothers me after this whole mess comes to an end:</p>
<blockquote><p>
we have found that these new accounts were in fact genuine and simply a result of your promotion of Sphinn to new users.
</p></blockquote>
<p>These &#8220;New Accounts&#8221; are &#8220;My Readers&#8221; whom I referred over to Sphinn.com. <strong>How about a thank you</strong>, Rob Kerry for sending you new people to the Sphinn.com community? Or, would that be too difficult for you? </p>
<p>Anyway, I am glad to see that my story is back live and even more pleased to see that it made the front page of Sphinn.com as that my aim for yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
