How Google Is Dealing With Black Hat SEO Practices
So, you want to know how I think Google is dealing with Black Hat SEO practices? Before I get into the bulk of this article, I want to let you know up front that the things I say in this article are not proven. They are only twisted works of my most inner brain coupled with a little case of paranoia. In the past, I have published two articles that talk about a theory I have which I call Google Digital Fingerprint. You can check out my article titled, A Prediction of What The Future Will Hold For Google an SEO and I touch on this sick and crazy theory in another article titled, Using Stumbleupon To Help Shape and Mold Your Digital Fingerprint. Basically to sum things up in a nutshell, I believe that the search results in Google are influenced by the content that people bookmark in Google Bookmarks. Secondly, I totally have proof that the search results are different from person to person while logged into iGoogle. I didn’t know this second part up until a few nights ago.
Why Do I Believe That Google Bookmarks Have An Influence on Search Results?
The reason I believe that Google Bookmarks hold weight on the content that ranks in the Google index is because Google Bookmarks are private to the individual user. With that said, I believe that Google considers a certain level of VALUE in the activity of Google Bookmark users. With Google Bookmarks being a private stash of tagged and organized links created by an end users, these links, listings, and content are valuable to the end user, otherwise the end user wouldn’t waste his time bookmarking it. In other words, if the content that is being bookmarked by the end users wasn’t of personal value to that end user, then there would be no benefit to bookmark the content.
How Is This Different From StumbleUpon?
Looking at StumbleUpon is a great comparison. People vote and submit content into the StumbleUpon network simply because a friend asks them to. The VALUE factor is compromised due to the influence and public behaviors of people. Everyone does their friends favors and submits content or votes for content in the StumbleUpon network simply to be nice. However, when it comes to the end users system for holding a PRIVATE STASH of valuable references, links and resources, naturally the end user isn’t going to want to muddy up the waters on their organized and beautiful PRIVATE bookmarking system.
That is where Google kicks in and that is where my theory kicks in as well. If I were Google, I would want to constantly think of ways towards improving my results in my search engine. I understand that everyone tries to game Google. Many people are very successful with this. Google lists top results of content that should not be listed as top results. I see this more and more, especially as the Internet continues to grow.
How does Google take action on people who Game the SERPs? Simple, they turn to the data being collected in Google Bookmarks and then they look for trends. I think too that this includes Google looking to see how many people have bookmarked certain pages.
But what about simply gaming Google Bookmarks?
So yeah.. if all this is true, then what keeps people from just spamming their own Google Bookmarks? Well, I have an answer to that as well. This is where iGoogle kicks in. When you are logged into iGoogle and assuming you are allowing Google to track your web history, Google then has a digital paper trail of all the places you go on the Internet. Overtime, this activity starts to birth what I call, “Your Digital Fingerprint.”
What I mean by this is simple. Google monitors your behaviors on the Internet. Google can process data and LABEL your interests. Google knows if you visit CNN.com every morning. Google knows if you favor the color RED over GREEN. Google knows if you surf on eBay and also what items interest you on eBay. All in all, the longer you are logged into their iGoogle system, the more accurate and detailed of a natural digital fingerprint they have on you.
So what does all that mean? Simple… the digital fingerprint thwarts the activity of people simply spamming their own Google Bookmarks with content that goes against the grain of content that matches their digital fingerprint. Meaning, if you like the color GREEN and love DOGS and voted for Al Gore, yet you later submitted content that said you love RED and LOVE CATS and voted republican, it goes against your own personal Internet surfing behaviors and trends.
To thwart having the Google Bookmarking system gamed, I believe that more value is assigned to Google Bookmark users who have a longer history of topic consistency. People who continue to grow their digital fingerprint have more of an influence on the overall big picture of things. In other words, this too thwarts the efforts of end users simply creating new Google Accounts for the purpose of using Google Bookmarks to shape and mold their own new digital fingerprints for a particular niche topic that they want to game in the Google search results. Don’t get me wrong, this can be done, but a lot of time and energy would have to be invested towards successfully creating, shaping and molding a digital identity that will be used towards having just a very minimal impact on SERPs.
All in all, if this theory proves true, I see it almost as a perfect system for ranking content in Google. This system really puts a damper on people who try to game the Google search results. Not many people would be willing to take part in a super mind job against a computer just to hit a few good rankings in the SERPs. That is unless you were me.
I have been bookmarking a lot of things lately and while I can’t really produce any material that proves this, I do believe that it has an influence on things. With that said I am considering creating multiple Google Accounts that I am indeed would like to use towards growing and painting an online picture or rather a “digital fingerprint” exactly how I want it. That way when I need to get a tennis lessons web pages indexed and ranked in Google, I can simply do all the normal SEO tweaks and tricks that I do and also as a bonus, use the digital tennis fingerprint that I created. Google is a very powerful system that I think thousands of people under estimate and also don’t understand completely.
I think any company that has a NASDAQ stock price so expensive where I can’t even afford to purchase ONE SHARE has some pretty freaky things going on in the inside. Needless to say, Google, Inc. has a very powerful engine that I believe has been taking on the form of a very super power artificial intelligence that learns from the activities of end users at a very accelerated pace.
Popularity: 1% [?]
16 comments
Wow, there is some food for thought……
Great post Garry. That really gets me thinking and wondering. I remember you posting those posts awhile back and reading them and thinking you were just losing your marbles ;P
You made some very valid points and would be very interested in seeing how it does exactly work out. Hmmmm, maybe it’s time we all took part in your theory and see what we could come up with.
Hey Garry,
That is interesting stuff. I think I know what you are referring to when you mention the search results are different for the same keyword when logged into Google. The theory seems to have substance and like Jarret, I think a larger experiment on this may lead to some interesting results.
Check out Murray’s last blog post..What Is Cellulite
That is some good stuff there man!
I also think Google Notebook plays along the same lines.
I mean, what else is Google Notebook good for really?
I like building them because they are ‘plain Jane’ and you can add links too.
Al
Check out Allyn’s last blog post..How To Rejuvenate Your Lawn This Fall, It’s Easy!
I like and dislike the idea of a digital finger print. But I definately see how one might use it to benefit. After all if google is making it available and the results bear out then go for it.
Check out shane at making-money-blogging.com’s last blog post..making money with facebook and facebook indexing
I like it! When will this service become available? I will give it a try.
Hey Gemini, I think you misunderstand what Garry was saying. He is talking about how we each leave a “digital fingerprint”, not that there is any new type service available.
Check out David Cooley’s last blog post..Wigix Marketplace
Shane says aboeve that it is a new google service coming out soon but says he dislikes their idea. I think it is great and I will sign up as soon as it is available.
You are missing the WHOLE point of this post……
However if you must sign up to this service, http://www.google.com/bookmarks/
is that the link to the digital finger print?
Maybe it is…….maybe it isn’t. Only one way to find out.
Gemini,
if you are looking to sign up for digital stuff, I can paste a bunch of affiliate links for you. just ask, I am glad to provide free digital links for you, just don’t mess with the hop, ok?
LOL
AL
Check out Allyn’s last blog post..How To Rejuvenate Your Lawn This Fall, It’s Easy!
I don’t know, its hard to say all of the factors that they include. If they were doing this I doubt that they could compute all of this information in real time, but perhaps chunks of it in “updates”
As for different users seeing different results, I have confirmed this. I have noticed that in some cases search results with maps will show different results based on your geographic location. Some say that you hit a different data center, while this is true, it is also possible that they could be using a GeoIP database and catering results depending on your location.
Either way I turn of customized search results and history off, because I want to see what people searching for the first time see.
Check out Owen’s last blog post..Free Linux & Tech Related Books.
Another interesting post Garry, I’ve not looked at using Google bookmarks or web history as yet, I may need to look into this a bit more – if I were Google I would certainly utilise this information in some way!
Check out Zath’s last blog post..LG Plasma TVs
Amazing Garry conn . It is great idea for everybody.
Thank you for idea. good
That’s definitely something to think about. I wonder if there is any validity to your theory. Do Google bookmarks influence search results? It definitely seems like a plausible theory. Thanks for the thought-provoking post!
Gary, I think your “over thinking” the abilities of Google somewhat. Can they really store (and maintain) the bookmarks that people make, analyze them, and use advanced algorithms to decipher accurately how much weight should be put on each website based on that information? I'm a bit skeptical, but then again if they have super-computers at google anything is possible. Thanks again for a wonderful, thought-provoking article!
Leave a Comment